I like both. The clouds stand out more in the Sepia, for better or worse. But the original image, when presented last week, brought this question to my mind. How could he improve on a shot that’s already hot?
This image seems to me to work better in monochrome. The sepia seems to break up the continuity of the line + clouds at the top. I focus more on the clouds than the entire effect of the composition. In my opinion the black-and-white shapes blend better with those tones.
Good points, Sally. Thanks for sharing them. I also thought about toning the entire image and then putting a pop of color in there. The jury’s still out on that idea.
Ω
I am in agreement with Sally, and would also add that use of sepia very much depends on the subject and composition…
LikeLike
There is a sweet spot for toning somewhere in this photo. I will continue to look for it.
Ω
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good luck, Allan!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like both. The clouds stand out more in the Sepia, for better or worse. But the original image, when presented last week, brought this question to my mind. How could he improve on a shot that’s already hot?
LikeLike
Thanks, Tom. Sometimes knowing when to stop is more difficult than finding where to begin.
Ω
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been playing with a new logo too.
LikeLike
The urge must be going around the blogosphere. I have a few versions sketched out myself.
Ω
LikeLiked by 1 person
This image seems to me to work better in monochrome. The sepia seems to break up the continuity of the line + clouds at the top. I focus more on the clouds than the entire effect of the composition. In my opinion the black-and-white shapes blend better with those tones.
LikeLike
Good points, Sally. Thanks for sharing them. I also thought about toning the entire image and then putting a pop of color in there. The jury’s still out on that idea.
Ω
LikeLike